C&Assess

Candidate analysis

Placement Readiness Mock 01 · Submitted

Your attempt, explained.

Not just a score: see exactly where marks were won, lost, or left unattempted.

Net score71/100

+13 marks from your previous mock

Percentile92.4Top 7.6% of 3,742
Rank284of 3,742 candidates
Accuracy70%35 correct · 15 incorrect
Attempt rate83%50 attempted · 10 skipped
Time used56:183:42 remained

Plain-language diagnosis

Accuracy is helping you. Data interpretation and hard-question selection are holding you back.

  • What worked: You converted 78% of attempted quantitative questions and stayed faster than the cohort on easy questions.
  • Biggest leak: 9 recoverable marks were lost on DI questions where you either rushed the setup or stayed too long.
  • Next mock target: Leave hard DI earlier, protect easy marks, and aim for 75% accuracy on medium questions.

Section scorecard

Performance by OA section

Score → accuracy → time
SectionScoreAttemptedAccuracyPercentileTimeSignal
Quantitative aptitude38/4518/2078%94.118:42Strong
Logical reasoning23/3517/2071%88.617:05Moderate
Data interpretation10/2015/2060%76.220:31Needs work

Root-cause signals

Why marks were lost

Rule-based · explainable
Time managementHigh impact

6 questions took over 1.4× the cohort median; three of them were still incorrect.

Question selectionMedium impact

You spent 7:14 on hard questions for a net gain of only 1 mark.

Concept / applicationMedium impact

DI margin and caselet questions show a repeated setup gap.

Careless errorsLow impact

Two fast errors occurred on questions most candidates answered correctly.

Marks left on the table

21

Potentially recoverable from wrong easy/medium questions and skipped questions with high cohort accuracy.

Wrong easy questions4 marks
Slow incorrect questions9 marks
High-success skips8 marks